Pages
Technology, Economy, Politics, Religion, Literature and all that matter
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Saturday, 22 March 2014
Liquifying Conspiracy Theories in the Age of Social Media (II)
Liquifying Conspiracy Theories in
the Age of Social Media (II)
For
the purpose of safety, we cannot discard the possibility of the often-coined
conspiracy theories, but in reality, the frequency of being true can be statistically
placed at 1 out of 10. Therefore, the existence of these theories is not as
frequent as the theorists do dish them out. It is therefore necessary to be
mild in their handling and tactically probe all heard in resistance to giving it
in to emotion and sentiment. To liquefy these theories, these are my outlined steps.
This is not an exhaustive list; readers are also free to contribute to this
open discourse.
1 Be informed, Conspiracy Theory
exists:
One
rule of thumb is to be informed that conspiracy theory exists. That saying: ‘To every rumour, there is an iota of truth’
cannot be taken as a validated theory. It happens more than imagined that no
iota of truth will be found in a viral rumour. It will be a completely fabricated
story, a hoax per excellence exists, and unsuspecting audience will be caught
in the wilderness of conspiracy theory. Knowing that conspiracy theory exists
and always fierce in its penetration prepares your psyche that not all ‘BREAKING’;
‘UNVEILED’ is actually breaking truth or unveiling reality.
In
most instances, conspiracy theories are cooked up for sympathy gathering for
political manipulation. Remember the conspiracy theory that wrapped the Boston bombing as a stage-managed hoax? The killing of Lee Rigby in London is the feeblest
attempt by conspiracy theorists.
2
De-emphasizing
source credibility:
As
I have observed, people often become victims of conspiracy theory when a substantial
credibility is attached to the source of the news. These are cases when victims
will want to inform you that the news is got from Wikileaks! and so what? Recently, my Facebook post addressing Dr.
Ahmad Gumi’s recent reckless utterances –which are outpour of conspiracy
theories- invited anger from the blind followers of the respected cleric. In
this situation, Gumi is their credible source, and anything that comes from him
is classified information that not everybody can have access to. And because of this, it must be taken hook, line and sinker. A guy even
went to the extent of publishing his (Gumi) resume to tell me why all his posts must be
taken in the same faith as the passages of Qur’an or Bible. Just as I earlier
highlighted, being a victim of conspiracy theory is not a symptom of weak intelligence,
it has more to do with emotional intelligence. Ability to foster reason, logic
and intense probe in the face of emotional appeal is the antidote. This
explanation leads to the third and last on my list; Ask more questions.
3
Ask
more questions:
Yeah!
Because of the circumstance of our social reality, an unfortunate situation
that has proved the existence of scam artists and spin doctors with their
conspiratorial dishes. The onus lies on us; we have to be armed against the
conspiracy of the conspiracy theorists. After being psychologically prepared
that their existence and disabuse our mind from the infallibility of our source
of news, we need to ask more questions to unravel the obscurity of conspiracy
theories. This unfortunately can only be done by a mind that has the probing
ability. Like the case of Adebolajo; the killer of Lee Rigby, questions that
were asked to redirect the minds of the victims of the attached conspiracy
theory is: Was his arrest in Kenya during his planned entry to Somalia
stage-managed, was his involvement in series hate protests spearheaded by Anjem
Choudary stage-managed? When several questions are posed as a result of wide
consultation and information acquisition on the subject matter, the string of
conspiracy theory is always revealed. This must be done with a fair share of
emotional intelligence.
Liquifying Conspiracy Theories in the Age of Social Media (I)
Liquifying
Conspiracy Theories in the Age of Social Media (I)
Apart
from a literal encounter with the word ‘conspiracy’, I practically met this
word in late 2003. It was at a public lecture which I could not vividly
recollect its details. As a personal culture, immediately the programme was
over, I went to browse through the stack of books displayed at the venue’s
mart, and my eyes got hinged to this book titled: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion! Can I have that book? -I said, pointing to the unappealing cover
design but heart-catching titled book. The book seller replied: You want Jewish
Conspiracy? I didn’t know the book which goes by ‘The Protocols of Elders of
Zion’ has its aka as Jewish
Conspiracy. Yes, I responded in affirmative, since I know Zionists and Jews are
related, though not substitutable.
Whether the content of the book is real or fictitious (anti-Semitic as alleged from some quarters), the fact is I
enjoyed the book, and it even propelled me to get some corroborating books like
CIA and the Third World by Satish Kumar and the Third World Calamity by May
Brian. These books and others –addressing the same or similar theme- which I
have been ‘unfortunate’ to read have made me a potential victim of conspiracy
theory. For the benefit of those who might not have come across such
conspiratorial books, their content can be safely summarised as narrations of undercover
plan and actions of the West sponsored and supported by the Zionists in a bid
to control the world (and keep controlling the world) and quench all potential
obstacles of this supreme goal. A deep and profound dialectical analysis of
these books is not the focus of this essay. This introduction is basically to
point to the possibility of absorbing all dicks and harry conspiracy theories,
no matter how logical minded you want to be, most especially if you have been
exposed to similar narrative espoused by these books and their ilk. Without
mincing words, we cannot discard the possible plausibility of these
conspiratorial narrations for two reasons: 1. self-confessions from the alleged characters like the Hillary Clinton's assertion of the US complicity in the creation of al-Qaeda, and 2. the complexity of global politics dated back to the bipolar cold war of East versus West bloc.
However, believing these narrations ought to be
after exhaustive probe and questions to concretely establish its correctness.
But because of its often emotional and sentimental attachment, we rush to find
succour in conspiracy theories; we unknowingly become victims of
misinformation.
At
circumstance powered by technological advancement will have it, the advent of
social media and almighty internet have totally dislodged the wall of
gatekeeping in journalism. As it affords us the opportunity of multiple sources
of information, it dilutes the possibility of controlled mainstream media, but
further exposes us to the era of cyber misinformation; we are more than before
prone to be victims of conspiracy theories. In avoidance of historical
revisionism, the most potent conspiracy theory being sold to Nigerians at the
moment, and massively bought by the Muslims is that the North-West carnage chaired by a group of scavengers called Boko Haram is sponsored by the
combination (or in isolation) of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), the Presidency,
Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta (MEND), France, and United States
of America –working towards the ‘prediction’ that Nigeria will break by 2015.
The
proponents of this conspiracy theory have loads of para-convincing arguments to
forge their proposition to the target conclusion. They even exhibit ideological
fanaticism by casting doubt on ones' intelligence quotient when you
challenge the veracity of their anti-mainstream information. They label you a
West brainwashed audience, and they hardly conceive the possibility of also
being a brainwashed victim of conspiracy theorists. The debate of: who and who
are the architects of the unfortunate experience in the North-eastern part of
Nigeria is equally not my focus here. However, I have to reiterate this point
(as I always do): in as much as there are possibilities of all the propositions
being hawked by the conspiracy theorists, to absorb or deny the presence of
some misguided Muslims as foot soldiers perpetrating this savagery and failure to internationalize Boko Haram's agitation in the same context with what is obtainable with Seleka rebel of Central African Republic, al-Shabaab in Somalia, Moro Islamic Front in Philippine, and Southern Thailand Muslim separatist movement is intellectual
dishonesty.
In
the ocean of probabilities of all events thereof, not becoming victims of cyber
misinformation or preys in the claws of conspiracy theorists requires a more
robust mind set; a psycho-cognitive composition that endeavours to separate
emotional attachment to the story aired from the sense of judgement in the cause of probing and fact
finding. It is against this backdrop that I outlined the following steps as
practical approach to be liquifying conspiracy theories, most especially during
this social media age –when its negative influence on our collective psyche is
better imagined than described.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


