In further dialectics of this tweet: Power rotatn is the cause? the losers of the last electn re responsible? BH wants shariah?they re possible/complementary causes. ask me why
@SemiuAkanmu on Twitter
In answering the question "why all the three highlights are possible complementary causes of our present state of insecurity in Nigeria?"
History had simply explained the dominance of Muslims in the North, Christians' dominance in the South-East/ South-South, and an averagely balanced mix-population in the south west via the islamic gospel evangelism of Usman dan Fodio (for the North), and the Missionary immigrants through badagry and coast of Rivers state (for the south-south/south east). This population advantage had been a two-edge sword for the respective organised religionists in these respective zones, evidently shown in their religious bigotry, vis-a-vis nepotism, and religious wrongheadedness.
North where the predominant religion is Islam is seen by the Muslims as an advantage to push forth their interest of a religious state where Shariah will be the instrument of legal jurisdiction, however the mode of actualizing this differs: while some believe it is an intellectual warfare which will be time-consuming, others believe taking up arms is the way out, the latter is mostly detested by the fold due to its inconsistency with Quranic authorities, however it evidently polarized the fold to sects; largely diverse in their ideology.
This sympathy and subjectivity inherent in an average Muslim is what is exploited by the ruling class especially our characterized politicians to win the interest of this religious populace on the premise that they will be in support of shariah in as much they are voted into power. Zamfara under the leadership of Yerima Sanni is an evidence towards this direction.
As the intellectual advocate of Shariah like Jama't Nasril Islam continues their religious struggle and advocacy, Moh'd Yussuf perhaps finds the methodology slow or unyielding, believing schooling and harnessing education to forge the Shariah struggle ahead is counter-productive, hence he declared it Haram (forbidden), amongst some other reasons of his. Therefore, the existence of Boko haram have been, but in low-key since money and large recruits will be instrumental for an aggressive campaign.
This is the opportunity taken by the politicians to romance this trigger-happy group on the disguise that 'we are planning to implement shariah if we win', thus all support will be given, mainly as political thugs and assassins (accusation of Sambo, Shettima, Adume links to Boko Haram are evidences towards this direction).
This simply argues the opium that is characterized in the Boko Haram's advocacy, simply as a violence-oriented group, whose ideology is condemned by recognized legal jurists and authorities in Islam, to the extent that some have declared them non-Muslims because of the abominable acts that characterized their struggle.
Because of the unclearheadedness, self-centredness and the display of do-or-die antics of the Nigeria political players (the election losers & unfavourable persons by the choice of GEJ), these people (BH) are 'possibly' now employed on the platform of supporting their struggle which they are interested in pursuing, but unknowingly and covertly heating up the polity and the political landscape for their own political aggrandizement.
....................................
Simply my analysis: Semiu Ayobami Akanmu
@SemiuAkanmu on Twitter
In answering the question "why all the three highlights are possible complementary causes of our present state of insecurity in Nigeria?"
History had simply explained the dominance of Muslims in the North, Christians' dominance in the South-East/ South-South, and an averagely balanced mix-population in the south west via the islamic gospel evangelism of Usman dan Fodio (for the North), and the Missionary immigrants through badagry and coast of Rivers state (for the south-south/south east). This population advantage had been a two-edge sword for the respective organised religionists in these respective zones, evidently shown in their religious bigotry, vis-a-vis nepotism, and religious wrongheadedness.
North where the predominant religion is Islam is seen by the Muslims as an advantage to push forth their interest of a religious state where Shariah will be the instrument of legal jurisdiction, however the mode of actualizing this differs: while some believe it is an intellectual warfare which will be time-consuming, others believe taking up arms is the way out, the latter is mostly detested by the fold due to its inconsistency with Quranic authorities, however it evidently polarized the fold to sects; largely diverse in their ideology.
This sympathy and subjectivity inherent in an average Muslim is what is exploited by the ruling class especially our characterized politicians to win the interest of this religious populace on the premise that they will be in support of shariah in as much they are voted into power. Zamfara under the leadership of Yerima Sanni is an evidence towards this direction.
As the intellectual advocate of Shariah like Jama't Nasril Islam continues their religious struggle and advocacy, Moh'd Yussuf perhaps finds the methodology slow or unyielding, believing schooling and harnessing education to forge the Shariah struggle ahead is counter-productive, hence he declared it Haram (forbidden), amongst some other reasons of his. Therefore, the existence of Boko haram have been, but in low-key since money and large recruits will be instrumental for an aggressive campaign.
This is the opportunity taken by the politicians to romance this trigger-happy group on the disguise that 'we are planning to implement shariah if we win', thus all support will be given, mainly as political thugs and assassins (accusation of Sambo, Shettima, Adume links to Boko Haram are evidences towards this direction).
This simply argues the opium that is characterized in the Boko Haram's advocacy, simply as a violence-oriented group, whose ideology is condemned by recognized legal jurists and authorities in Islam, to the extent that some have declared them non-Muslims because of the abominable acts that characterized their struggle.
Because of the unclearheadedness, self-centredness and the display of do-or-die antics of the Nigeria political players (the election losers & unfavourable persons by the choice of GEJ), these people (BH) are 'possibly' now employed on the platform of supporting their struggle which they are interested in pursuing, but unknowingly and covertly heating up the polity and the political landscape for their own political aggrandizement.
....................................
Simply my analysis: Semiu Ayobami Akanmu
No comments:
Post a Comment